Most recently, the French have limited the number of terms that can make a president. Neither CRTV, Cameroon Tribune nor , nobody has reported ...
Where are the intellectuals interested, Cameroon, who praise the plan as a project foolish to abolish limitation of presidential mandates in our country? Have they lost both, tongue and pen? They cited as a model, France, where the number of presidential terms was not limited. But now that France, in fact, has decided the opposite. Why do they talk more? Do they not informed?
OF LIAR: "intellectuals" CAMEROON
Throughout the campaign for the lifting of limitation of presidential terms, we ended up with at least three types of intellectuals: those who do not know, so a bunch of ignorant, despite their aggregations are anything and they give to their classes Soa ( we pity our poor children they are ), those who knew, but were lying, and finally, those who knew, but were stifled. This latter category that concerns us very little here.
Intellectuals ignorant.
This is the band of individuals who, like parrots, repeating, endlessly, that the president is right, much better, it is "the chance of Cameroon " because he "has brought peace, that this constitutional amendment will allow, finally, of having " free hand to implement its policy of greater ambitions . They spread a lot of respect fool like that. Naturally, they laughed, frantically, to know the opinion that the population would have them, since they hoped to be heard by that law, namely the President of the Republic.
intellectuals who knew but lied.
This category is approached first, insofar as only the result mattered, namely that the message of their commitment alongside the frantic dying regime renewal reaching the ear of the President of the Republic . So they bribe journalists in CRTV to obtain interview log in 13 hours, were included in the debates of soporific CRTV-television , inundated by their speech, private radio waves that His Excellency the Mincom had finally closed, bought full pages in newspapers instead to reassure themselves better to be seen, because competition was fierce parrots.
WHAT WAS THE PURPOSE OF LIE OR IGNORANCE?
The French Constitution of 1958, currently in effect, is the work of a dictator in the person of Charles de Gaulle. This character is known, loathed the 1946 constitution, that is to say, the one before, for three basic reasons: 1 / - controlled parliament there too, with its taste, the executive; 2 / - the president was not elected by universal suffrage, but by parliament; 3 / - The 1946 constitution was drafted by a constituent assembly, therefore, in the words of De Gaulle a " hogwash. " Let these three points.
The omnipotence of Parliament.
This criticism of De Gaulle was consistent with his abomination of the parliamentary system. As a good soldier, he dreamed of putting the French in it, as in a regiment. " At your orders! "is the language he was accustomed, and he wanted to hear of his countrymen. Consequently, the regime's preference, was the strong presidential system, quasi-dictatorial. In 1946, he had wanted to impose this spirit to France. The French have soon asked to take a hike elsewhere. He therefore entered into a retirement of 12 years, during which he had stopped plotting to overthrow the regime of the Fourth Republic, 1946-1958, that is to say that derived from the constitution that 'he detested. The events of Algiers, that the riots of the period of the independence of the French department, have given her an unexpected opportunity to take power without being elected, ie, being reminded of his political retirement simulated. In May 1958, he was actually invited by René Coty, President of the French Republic, to form the government, that is to say, to become Prime Minister (Chairman of the Board was called). Naturally, he accepted, but not without raising its conditions, the main one being the development of a new constitution. Now who said developing a new constitution, in a context such as that of France in 1958 where the authority of the state was on the ground, said, automatically, overthrow the regime. So how Charles de Gaulle organized a coup in France. He did not need the army, he needed riots in Algiers.
In developing its constitution, it goes without saying that Charles de Gaulle was careful to elect a constituent assembly, this "hogwash." Instead, he instead created a "Constitutional Consultative Committee. This famous committee drafted a constitution that was presented to the French people for approval, September 28, 1958. Naturally, given the tense climate that prevailed in France during the French people voted "YES". It only remained to René Coty to withdraw from power, and in December 1958, Charles de Gaulle was President of the Republic.
Most importantly to note is exactly the same way. ... Adolf Hitler came to power in January 1933. He did not win the election. He had that conspire during the previous ten years, threatening to fire and sword if Germany Paul von Hindenburg , President of 2 nd Reich does not designate the Prime Minister. Chancellor Adolf Hitler once, that is to say Premier ministre, on connaît la suite : 27 février 1933, incendie Reichstag, le Parlement allemand. C’était sa manière à lui d’anéantir le parlement.
Charles de Gaulle, pour sa part, lui a considérablement réduit les pouvoirs, au point où, la récente réforme de la constitution française, a eu pour finalité, entre autre, le rééquilibrage des pouvoirs entre l’exécutif et le législatif, au profit du législatif. Voilà ce que les intellectuels camerounais, soit ne savaient pas en ergotant sur la levée de la limitation du mandat présidentiel au Cameroun, soit savaient, mais, taisaient.
L’élection du président de la République par le parlement.
Ceci est la conséquence toute logique de tout régime parlementaire. Il était ainsi normal qu’en France, le président de la République ne fut pas élu au suffrage universel. Mais, cela comporte comme principale conséquence, que ce dernier ne pèse pas d’un grand poids sur les institutions. Ce que De Gaulle ne pouvait admettre. Il voulait être un quasi-roi. En 1962, il a, ainsi, procédé à la modification de cette clause, en faisant désormais élire le président de la République au suffrage universel, transformant définitivement de cette manière le régime politique français en régime présidentiel.
L’élaboration de la constitution par une assemblée constituante.
Toutes les constitutions avant de Gaulle, avaient été élaborées ainsi. La raison en est que c’est le mode d’élaboration démocratique d’une constitution. En 1945, au sortir de la guerre, la France a ainsi élu une première assemblée constituante dont la constitution qu’elle avait élaborée avait été rejetée par le peuple, au cours du référendum qui avait suivi. Cette première assemblée constituante a alors été, d’office, dissoute. Une seconde a été élue. C’est cette dernière qui a élaboré la constitution de 1946, que Charles de Gaulle détestait à mourir. Le Cameroun avait des députés à ces deux assemblées constituantes : Louis-Paul Aujoulat, pour le compte des Blancs du Cameroun, et Alexandre Douala Manga Bell, pour le compte des « indigènes ', That is to say, us. But that's the one thing that shocked most of de Gaulle, that the Negroes were able to participate in the drafting of the French constitution. He regarded this as an insult, a defilement.
Our Cameroonian intellectuals who were modeled on the French Constitution of 1958 did they know this?
0 comments:
Post a Comment