Tuesday, July 1, 2008

How Do You Say Milena

Presidential elections in Zimbabwe and Paul Biya in Cameroon

Re-election of Robert Mugabe, Zimbabwe is a test that Paul Biya is following with great interest and attention. This is a trial run for him, which he will, tomorrow, Cameroon.

The success of the coup of Robert Mugabe in Zimbabwe, after that of Moi Kibaki in Kenya has greatly welcomed Paul Biya, Cameroon. This leap backward for democracy on our continent, can only fill it with joy. Just as it had done for the constitutional amendment, that draw on examples of Idriss Deby, Chad, Ben Ali of Tunisia, etc., it can not fail to learn this new way to keep power, the cons will of the people that are trying to open Kibaki and Mugabe. It appears as follows: 1 / - Elections, 2 / - in case of defeat, resorting to violence, 3 / - provides, through international intermediaries, sharing power with the winner. The formula has been successful in Kenya, she is being redrawn in Zimbabwe, there is no reason why it should not be applied tomorrow, Cameroon. After all, the desire of the dictators like Paul Biya? Remain in power, and nothing else. No matter how.

" JE NE SUIS PAS AHMADOU AHIDJO » VERSION CAMEROUNAISE DE « C’EST DIEU SEUL QUI ME FERA PARTIR DU POUVOIR »

« Je ne suis pas Ahmadou Ahidjo qui avait démissionné », tels sont les propos que prêtent à notre Paul national, ses proches. Ceux-ci ne sont rien d’autre que la version camerounaise des propos extravagants de Robert Mugabe : « l’opposition ne prendra jamais le pouvoir tant je serai en vie ». La preuve, Paul Biya s’est tout d’abord octroyé une « majorité confortable au Parlement ». Puis, grâce à celle-ci, il a procédé à la révision Constitution makes him a candidate for life in the presidential office. Meanwhile, he has poured troops into the streets in Cameroon in order to terrorize the population. The latter being retracted into its shell, Paul Biya declared victory. The method is not free. Then it proceeds, currently, an increase in the number of this special army to serve his remaining in power what the BIR, local version of the Schutzstaffel, the SS, the formidable squads protection of Adolf Hitler, whose Führer had used to stay in power through terror, Germany, from 1933.

L’ETAPE DE L’HEURE POUR PAUL BIYA

Pour l’heure, Paul Biya entend tirer tous les enseignements de la réaction de la communauté internationale. Les propos de Desmond Tutu, qui prône le recours à une intervention militaire pour débarquer Mugabe du pouvoir le font frémir – même s’il n’y croit pas beaucoup - tout comme les condamnations du Secrétaire Général des Nations Unies, de la Maison Blanche à Washington, ou de l’Union Européenne. En revanche, l’apathie de l’Union Africaine, tout comme de Tabo Mbeki, son homologue Sud Africain, le confortent dans ses intentions.

Internally, he prepares meticulously, in the field. He knows in advance that the next presidential Cameroon will be stormy, that people take to the streets. So in addition to recruiting in the BIR, to terrorize and has just completed Robert Mugabe, he strives now to mitigate, in advance, critics of the international community. That's why he just grant itself another six months to give life to ELECAM, the body will function to provide a measure of credibility to the poll that everyone knows in advance rigged.

Finally, silence radio and television, through the closure of Equinoxe and Magic FM, as ban opposition meetings will be held until the eve of the election. Thus, it can ensure that the opposition has been unable to deploy on the ground.

THE TIME OF INGENUITY

Given this situation, the time has come for the ingenuity us who we are calling for opposition to Cameroon. We must invent new methods of struggle, which can enable us to continue to mobilize the population, despite the media blockade and political regime inflicts on us. This is the task of the hour Cameroonians, many who refuse to attend as spectators resigned, and ultimately complicit in total forfeiture of our country.

What Is A Damper Control On A Tripod?

The latest events in Bakassi or crédilibité of Cameroon and his army in question

The abduction of our sub-prefect and officers of our army recently in Bakassi, just, once again, the problem, oh crucial, credibility, à la fois de notre pays, que de notre armée nationale, sur le plan sous-régional. Bien mieux, il vient mettre à nu les carences de notre gouvernance, c’est-à-dire du régime en place, et surtout, de sa diplomatie. Tout Camerounais patriote, ne peut que, légitimement, s’en offusquer profondément.

LES BANDITS ONT UNE NATIONALITE

Qui a opéré le rapt et l’assassinat de notre sous-préfet et de nos officiers à Bakassi ? La réponse du gouvernement est toute simple : « des bandits ». Traduction, des individus incontrôlables, qui n’agissent que par eux-mêmes. N’existe-t-il no bandits in Cameroon? Our government control there? It can be held accountable for their atrocities? Such is the reasoning behind the response made by the Chief of Defence Staff, in lieu of an official statement from our government. But, since the latter is no denying the opposite, this opinion is, ex officio, the government itself. He endorses it automatically.

The answer, unfortunately, can not be satisfactory, and is neither more nor less, as casual. "The bandits have kidnappés et tués, que voulez-vous que nous fassions ? », telle est sa traduction concrète. Elle ne peut, en aucune manière, nous satisfaire. Les bandits, quels qu’ils soient, sont dotés d’une nationalité. Dès lors que des voyous franchissent la frontière de leur pays et vont opérer de tels actes derrière celle-ci, qui plus est, en territoire ennemi, et s’évanouissent dans la nature, en fait, retournent dans leur pays d’origine, nous ne pouvons plus nous contenter de l’argument selon lequel, ce sont des individus que nul ne contrôle. Nous sommes obligés de nous en remettre à leur nationalité, c’est-à-dire à leur gouvernement. Imagine there be bandits Cameroon perpetrating murders across the same border in Bakassi, including assassinating the administrative authorities and officers of the Nigerian army, without the Nigerian government takes action? Impossible. And he would be right to be angry. But as regards our own, these murders were classified in the account, already heavily supplied, losses and profits in the neighborhood of Nigeria.

We can not allow that. Even better, we're asking ourselves a series of questions, 1 / - in whose interest Nigerian bandits would they come Cameroonian officials assassinated? 2 / - Bakassi is not the Niger Delta, these so-called bandits would they be spontaneous generation, since, firstly, we have never heard before, on the other hand, no to date, has claimed responsibility for the assassination, and finally, the bandits operating in the Niger Delta them operate abductions followed by political demands? 3 / - The Nigerian government, or else that of the Bakassi border state, does not he find some interest in conducting a guerrilla war in the Cameroonian administration that must be deployed on the ground? 4 / - assassination Cameroonian officials it is not the prelude to other repeater assassinations of officials in Cameroon Bakassi history of discouraging military officials and Cameroon to settle in these places? We see, we can not settle for theses bandits. This is, quite simply, to close the case. We say, no.

a series of blunders and low

In truth, the issue of Bakassi is the kind of bulky file que le gouvernement camerounais, depuis toujours, n’a aps su gérer. Tout a commencé par la guerre du Biafra à l’époque d’Ahmadou Ahidjo. Il n’était nullement dans l’intérêt du Cameroun de soutenir le gouvernement central, dirigé par Yakubu Gowon, ainsi que s’était attelé à le faire Ahmadou Ahidjo. Il était plutôt de l’intérêt du Cameroun de rester neutre dans ce conflit. La raison ? Une victoire du Biafra, dans la guerre de sécession, aurait été avantageuse pour nous, dès lors que nous nous serions retrouvés avec un Etat voisin moins puissant à nos frontières, à la place du matodonde actuel qu’est férédale Republic of Nigeria. But, Ahmadou Ahidjo acted advantage of tribalism as political realism. He has no special interest in Cameroon. He had, moreover, made his decision without consulting anyone. There had been no prior debate in the National Assembly. Everyone knows that dictators make decisions for themselves, otherwise they would not dictators. The Biafran war had the immediate source, the massacre of thousands of Biafra by the Hausa in northern Nigeria. In response, a year later, Odumegu Ojuku proclaimed the secession of the State of Biafra. Hence the war. How Cameroon was he concerned in the slaughter? Thanks in Cameroon, which had officially closed its land and maritime borders in Biafra, but in fact his second flight in army reinforcements to the central government, the Biafran secession ended in failure. This support of Cameroon to preserve the unity of Biafra, would have resulted in a profound gratitude on the part of Nigeria to our country. But, as has been the case? The Bakassi conflict is not he an eloquent illustration of the ingratitude of Nigeria? Ahmadou Ahidjo had acted out of feelings, Nigerians they make them to him today? The responsibility of Ahmadou Ahidjo is considerable in the quagmire that is Bakassi to date for Cameroon.

NO WAR NO PEACE TALKS REAL

After the departure of Ahmadou Ahidjo's regime has done little better renewal . During the first attack Nigerian Bakassi, at the very beginning of the crisis, Cameroonian soldiers on the front, waited in vain for the order to retaliate. Power, in Yaounde, s’est lancé dans les interminables réunions et atermoiements dont il a le secret, et les troupes nigérianes ont continué à avancer, inexorablement, puis à s’installer confortablement sur notre sol. Finalement, l’ordre de riposter n’est jamais venu de Yaoundé. Tout ce qui a été demandé à nos soldats, a été de contenir les troupes nigérianes, c’est-à-dire de tout entreprendre, uniquement, pour stopper leur progression, mais, pas de les déloger du sol camerounais. Or, nos soldats en avaient bel et bien les moyens. Puis, le gouvernement camerounais a choisi la voie de la diplomatie. Ce faisant, il a commis une erreur politique grave : la diplomatie, en cas de conflit, ne doit intervenir qu’après un cessez le feu consécutif à une rude bataille. Il aurait fallu livrer une guerre intense d’au moins un mois entier, contre le Nigeria, avant de passer à la phase diplomatique. Tous les stratèges du monde entier sont unanimes sur ce point. Pas de diplomatie, c’est-à-dire de pourparlers de paix, sans véritable guerre. En d’autres termes, le Cameroun a mis la charrue avant les bœufs.

Bien mieux, dans cette voie diplomatique, le Cameroun n’a pas su utiliser toutes les cartes qu’il détenait entre ses mains. Par exemple, le Cameroun n’est nullement parvenu à rallier à its cause, the CEMAC countries. One of them has even been recovered by Nigeria. This is Equatorial Guinea. Nigeria led him to file a complaint against us to weaken our position in front of him, putting aside all the good neighborly relations that had existed previously with Cameroon. In fact, Teodoro Obiang Nguema has acted in a statesman who therefore stands above all the interests of his country. Ahmadou Ahidjo that had failed to do in 1967 at the outbreak of the Biafran war.

The Cameroon had another card extrêmement précieuse, face au Nigeria. Il s’agit du désir de notre ennemi d’obtenir un siège permanent au Conseil de Sécurité des Nations Unies. Le Cameroun avait la possibilité de contre-attaquer sur le plan international, en menant une campagne basée sur le fait que, le Nigeria ne pouvait prétendre à une telle position politique sur le plan mondial, dès lors que son armée avait envahi le territoire d’un pays voisin, et y était installée. Il fallait qu’au préalable, Abuja opère un retrait de celle-ci, pour être en mesure de prétendre siéger dans cette haute instance de maintien de la paix, sur le plan mondial, qu’est le Conseil de Sécurité United Nations. But Cameroon has, simply, let slip through his fingers, this unexpected windfall.

THE CAMEROON never got angry at NIGERIA

Since the outbreak of this conflict of Bakassi, Cameroon has never showed his anger. He only shave from start to finish, walls, and nothing else. Since he has chosen diplomacy, and he had several options at his disposal. 1 / - It could break off diplomatic relations with Nigeria. He did not. Why? How do I know? The history provides no example of a country that has managed to maintain diplomatic relations with another occupying its territory. There is no example of this type throughout the history of international relations. 2 / - He might, at least, recall our ambassador in Lagos. Usually, when a country's troops crossing the border to another to settle on its territory, the first thing that happens, inevitably, is the recall of the ambassador of the country which was invaded , which is accredited with the invading country. Yaounde did not even do. What we feared? We were already at war. 3 / - Cameroon could have closed its border with Nigeria. We did not fact. 4 / - Cameroon could have requested the departure of all Nigerians residing on its soil. We did not do well. In short, we have not done anything that was likely to demonstrate our anger. In conducting the expulsion of all Nigerians based in Cameroon, more than 5 million people, that would put the government of Lagos in danger. This would have posed a real problem even internationally. 5 million expelled, it is not easy to manage. Naturally, Nigeria would have done the same, but how are we there? Are we reaching just 500,000 souls? Not at all. So what we feared?

In the military, we do not show our anger. Nigeria would have learned that Cameroon has already amassed more than 10,000 soldiers in Bakassi, it would have changed his opinion. But this too, we did not. Our attitude was to cajole, systematically, Nigeria, from beginning to end. In the end, he does not always cooperate.

POLICIES OF SYMBOLIC ACTS

From a purely political, not diplomatic, simply visit the head of state of Cameroon Bakassi had marked the spirits considerably, both in Nigeria and Cameroon. But nothing has been done in this direction since the conflict there. Once news of the abduction of Cameroonian officials, recently known, the Cameroonian head of state should, logically, to interrupt his holiday Switzerland, and reapply the next day in Cameroon, to go straightway to Bakassi. Nothing. He went quietly, his vacation and only returned to Cameroon for the CEMAC summit. Translation, " Bakassi to hell! . We saw George Bush in Iraq with his troops. We saw the American vice-president in Iraq, with American troops. We saw the defense minister of the United States in Iraq, with U.S. troops. We saw the American foreign minister in Iraq, with U.S. troops. When will the visit of Defence Minister of Cameroon in Bakassi? When will visit du ministre de l’administration territoriale à Bakassi ? Pourquoi tout ce monde ne s’y rend-t-il pas ?

TSAHAL FAIT PEUR

Israël est un tout petit pays, face à ses voisins arabes. Mais, nul ne peut se hasarder à le provoquer militairement. Tout le monde sait, d’avance, ce que cela va coûter. Tsaal, son armée, est redoutable. L’armée camerounaise, à ce jour, ne fait peur à personne. Bien mieux, elle fait même rire l’ensemble de nos voisins. A sa tête se troupe une bande de vieillards totalement gaga, plus hommes d’affaires que militaires. Et, tout autour de nous, tout le monde le sait. Le conflit de Bakassi s’est ainsi présenté comme une occasion inespérée de la faire respecter tout autour de nous. Mais, ordre lui a été donné de se contenter, simplement, de contenir les troupes nigérianes. Qui donc peut trembler devant elle ? Faut-il rappeler que c’est une armée qui n’est même pas parvenue à réussir un coup d’Etat ? Il se pose véritablement l’immense problème de sa crédibilité. Généraux gaga et corrompus, qui n’ont fait leurs preuves que contre leurs propres concitoyens à l’époque of scrub and dead cities, troops constantly in bars, getting drunk from morning to evening. The Cameroonian army burst out laughing everyone. That's too bad ...

Capture Card Freezes Windows Movie Maker

The limitation of the presidential term in France or when the mouths close to Cameroon

Most recently, the French have limited the number of terms that can make a president. Neither CRTV, Cameroon Tribune nor , nobody has reported ...

Where are the intellectuals interested, Cameroon, who praise the plan as a project foolish to abolish limitation of presidential mandates in our country? Have they lost both, tongue and pen? They cited as a model, France, where the number of presidential terms was not limited. But now that France, in fact, has decided the opposite. Why do they talk more? Do they not informed?

OF LIAR: "intellectuals" CAMEROON

Throughout the campaign for the lifting of limitation of presidential terms, we ended up with at least three types of intellectuals: those who do not know, so a bunch of ignorant, despite their aggregations are anything and they give to their classes Soa ( we pity our poor children they are ), those who knew, but were lying, and finally, those who knew, but were stifled. This latter category that concerns us very little here.

Intellectuals ignorant.

This is the band of individuals who, like parrots, repeating, endlessly, that the president is right, much better, it is "the chance of Cameroon " because he "has brought peace, that this constitutional amendment will allow, finally, of having " free hand to implement its policy of greater ambitions . They spread a lot of respect fool like that. Naturally, they laughed, frantically, to know the opinion that the population would have them, since they hoped to be heard by that law, namely the President of the Republic.

intellectuals who knew but lied.

This category is approached first, insofar as only the result mattered, namely that the message of their commitment alongside the frantic dying regime renewal reaching the ear of the President of the Republic . So they bribe journalists in CRTV to obtain interview log in 13 hours, were included in the debates of soporific CRTV-television , inundated by their speech, private radio waves that His Excellency the Mincom had finally closed, bought full pages in newspapers instead to reassure themselves better to be seen, because competition was fierce parrots.

WHAT WAS THE PURPOSE OF LIE OR IGNORANCE?

The French Constitution of 1958, currently in effect, is the work of a dictator in the person of Charles de Gaulle. This character is known, loathed the 1946 constitution, that is to say, the one before, for three basic reasons: 1 / - controlled parliament there too, with its taste, the executive; 2 / - the president was not elected by universal suffrage, but by parliament; 3 / - The 1946 constitution was drafted by a constituent assembly, therefore, in the words of De Gaulle a " hogwash. " Let these three points.

The omnipotence of Parliament.

This criticism of De Gaulle was consistent with his abomination of the parliamentary system. As a good soldier, he dreamed of putting the French in it, as in a regiment. " At your orders! "is the language he was accustomed, and he wanted to hear of his countrymen. Consequently, the regime's preference, was the strong presidential system, quasi-dictatorial. In 1946, he had wanted to impose this spirit to France. The French have soon asked to take a hike elsewhere. He therefore entered into a retirement of 12 years, during which he had stopped plotting to overthrow the regime of the Fourth Republic, 1946-1958, that is to say that derived from the constitution that 'he detested. The events of Algiers, that the riots of the period of the independence of the French department, have given her an unexpected opportunity to take power without being elected, ie, being reminded of his political retirement simulated. In May 1958, he was actually invited by René Coty, President of the French Republic, to form the government, that is to say, to become Prime Minister (Chairman of the Board was called). Naturally, he accepted, but not without raising its conditions, the main one being the development of a new constitution. Now who said developing a new constitution, in a context such as that of France in 1958 where the authority of the state was on the ground, said, automatically, overthrow the regime. So how Charles de Gaulle organized a coup in France. He did not need the army, he needed riots in Algiers.

In developing its constitution, it goes without saying that Charles de Gaulle was careful to elect a constituent assembly, this "hogwash." Instead, he instead created a "Constitutional Consultative Committee. This famous committee drafted a constitution that was presented to the French people for approval, September 28, 1958. Naturally, given the tense climate that prevailed in France during the French people voted "YES". It only remained to René Coty to withdraw from power, and in December 1958, Charles de Gaulle was President of the Republic.

Most importantly to note is exactly the same way. ... Adolf Hitler came to power in January 1933. He did not win the election. He had that conspire during the previous ten years, threatening to fire and sword if Germany Paul von Hindenburg , President of 2 nd Reich does not designate the Prime Minister. Chancellor Adolf Hitler once, that is to say Premier ministre, on connaît la suite : 27 février 1933, incendie Reichstag, le Parlement allemand. C’était sa manière à lui d’anéantir le parlement.

Charles de Gaulle, pour sa part, lui a considérablement réduit les pouvoirs, au point où, la récente réforme de la constitution française, a eu pour finalité, entre autre, le rééquilibrage des pouvoirs entre l’exécutif et le législatif, au profit du législatif. Voilà ce que les intellectuels camerounais, soit ne savaient pas en ergotant sur la levée de la limitation du mandat présidentiel au Cameroun, soit savaient, mais, taisaient.

L’élection du président de la République par le parlement.

Ceci est la conséquence toute logique de tout régime parlementaire. Il était ainsi normal qu’en France, le président de la République ne fut pas élu au suffrage universel. Mais, cela comporte comme principale conséquence, que ce dernier ne pèse pas d’un grand poids sur les institutions. Ce que De Gaulle ne pouvait admettre. Il voulait être un quasi-roi. En 1962, il a, ainsi, procédé à la modification de cette clause, en faisant désormais élire le président de la République au suffrage universel, transformant définitivement de cette manière le régime politique français en régime présidentiel.

L’élaboration de la constitution par une assemblée constituante.

Toutes les constitutions avant de Gaulle, avaient été élaborées ainsi. La raison en est que c’est le mode d’élaboration démocratique d’une constitution. En 1945, au sortir de la guerre, la France a ainsi élu une première assemblée constituante dont la constitution qu’elle avait élaborée avait été rejetée par le peuple, au cours du référendum qui avait suivi. Cette première assemblée constituante a alors été, d’office, dissoute. Une seconde a été élue. C’est cette dernière qui a élaboré la constitution de 1946, que Charles de Gaulle détestait à mourir. Le Cameroun avait des députés à ces deux assemblées constituantes : Louis-Paul Aujoulat, pour le compte des Blancs du Cameroun, et Alexandre Douala Manga Bell, pour le compte des « indigènes ', That is to say, us. But that's the one thing that shocked most of de Gaulle, that the Negroes were able to participate in the drafting of the French constitution. He regarded this as an insult, a defilement.

Our Cameroonian intellectuals who were modeled on the French Constitution of 1958 did they know this?

Treatment Of Short Film

The lack of political agenda of the CPDM and the current crisis in Cameroon


What a political party without a political program or with a vague political agenda? Nothing. It is unfortunately le drame que vit le Cameroun contemporain, avec le Rdpc, et, ceci, depuis la naissance de son ancêtre, l’Union Camerounaise, le 1 er mai 1958 à Garoua, et la transformation de celui-ci en Union Nationale Camerounaise, le 1 er septembre 1966.

LES PROGRAMMES POLITIQUES DES PARTIS POLITIQUES CAMEROUNAIS AVANT L’UNION CAMEROUNAISE

Il n’est guère nécessaire de passer en revue la totalité des partis politiques qui ont précédé la naissance Cameroonian Union, UC, in Garoua in 1958. Did observe that the most representative.

The political program of the UPC.

It is widely known. Nevertheless, it is important to remember that. "Reunification and Independence": that was it. He had been made since the creation of this political party or, more accurately, it is crucial that these two claims have been responsible for its creation. Because in normal things, a political party arises from a school of thought, and not from the fortune of an individual, or the aura of it.

The political program of the UPC was a relevance as the colonial administration was immediately known it, up against this political. The rest is history. Imprisonment, massacres, exile, murder, execution posts.

The political program of the Cameroon National Federation.

The Cameroon National Federation , CNF, is the political party created by Dr. Emmanuel Endeley in 1949. His political program, two points were as follows: 1 / - Transformation of the Southern Cameroons into separate autonomous region of Nigeria, 2 / - reunification of Cameroon.

The political program of the Cameroon Democratic Bloc, BDC.

This political party that had called her many detractors, BDC " Band of Cons", was créé par le colon le plus nuisible qu’avait connu le Cameroun, Louis-Paul Aujoulat. Son programme politique ? Opposition totale et farouche à l’Upc, et, à travers lui, à la réunification et à l’indépendance du Cameroun. Il se formulait ainsi que suit : « intégration du Cameroun au sein de l’Union Française ». Naturellement, il n’évoquait nullement la question de la réunification du Kamerun, pour une raison très simple : en sa qualité de parti politique créé par un Français et pro-français, il ne faisait que promouvoir la politique française au Cameroun. Celle-ci, au sujet de la réunification, consistait à une opposition fierce, being contrary to the Franco-British, 4 March 1916 on the sharing of Kamerun. Among the most famous members, thereafter, this political party, include these: Ahmadou Ahidjo, the future president, Charles Onana Awana, future Minister, Secretary General of the UDEAC Benoït Bindzi, future Minister and Ambassador to Cameroon, Jean Faustin Bétayéné, future minister and first CEO of the NIS, André Fouda, future minister and mayor of Yaounde during good behavior, etc..

The political program of the Kamerun National Democratic Party, KNDP.

This political party created by John Ngu Foncha, an offshoot of CNF, was political agenda, of course, the reunification of Cameroon. Foncha initially had a policy neutral on the question of whether Southern Cameroons would include Nigeria, or whether he restores the Kamerun, with the part under French domination of our homeland. Subsequently, he settled the debate, and became pro-recovery of Kamerun, that is to say, pro-reunification, while Dr. Emmanuel Endeley, for its part, became, frankly, pro-integration Nigeria.

THE POLICY AGENDA OF THE UNION CAMEROON, UC.

This party, created by Ahmadou Ahidjo, after this person had been appointed Prime Minister by Jean Ramadier February 18, 1958, had a political agenda in three points: 1 / - Unit Cameroon, 2 / - Cameroonian nation, 3 / - Franco-Cameroonian cooperation. Important. This political program was only the repetition of the inauguration speech read by Ahmadou Ahidjo, le 18 février 1958, devant l’Assemblée législative du Cameroun, ALCAM, et rédigé, à son intention, par son protecteur et bienfaiteur, Jean Ramadier, Haut-commissaire de la République française au Cameroun. C’est pourquoi, il ne fait allusion, nullement, aux problèmes politiques de l’heure, à savoir, la réunification du Cameroun, d’une part, et l’indépendance nationale. En fait, il détourne les Camerounais, vers d’autres préoccupations, celles qui n’offusquent pas les Français, ne portent pas atteinte à leur domination et exploitation de notre pays. Il insinue que le retard de développement du Cameroun serait la conséquence de son manque d’unité. Mensonge grotesque. D’une part, les Camerounais étaient unis, au moment de sa création, d’autre part, si le Cameroun était sous-développé en 1958, c’était à cause de l’exploitation effrénée du pays et l’abâtardissement de sa population qu’entraînait le colonialisme français. Son silence sur le problème de la réunification s’explique par l’hostilité de la France sur cette question, tout comme l’était la « Bande de cons ». Cette idéologie anti-nationale de l’Union Camerounaise, s’imposera par la violence, aux Camerounais qui, naturellement, la rejetaient. D’où la dictature féroce qui s’est abattue, sur le Cameroun, au lendemain de la naissance de l’UC, c’est-à-dire après le 18 février 1958.

LE PROGRAMME POLITIQUE DE L’UNION NATIONALE CAMEROUNAISE

C’est en 1966, plus précisément, le 1 er septembre, que l’Union Camerounaise s’est transformée, par absorption forcée des partis politiques du Cameroun occidental, ceux du Cameroun oriental ayant déjà été sabordés par l’emprisonnement de la totalité de leurs leaders politiques, en Union Nationale Camerounaise, UNC. Ainsi, le terme utilisé pour désigner l’UNC, et qui était, « parti unifié », n’est qu’en partie vrai. Il y a eu, effectivement, unification avec trois partis politiques du Cameroun occidental, le KNDP, Kamerun National Democratic Party , de John Ngu Foncha, le CUC, Cameroon United Congress , de Salomon Tandeng Muna, et le CPNC, Cameroon People Nationale Congress , mais, il importe d’insister sur ce point, par l’intimidation. Quiconque se serait opposé à la décision d’absorption his party with that of Ahmadou Ahidjo, was purely and simply thrown in jail, as were all the political leaders of East Cameroon, which had, which were the main, Andre Marie Mbida, Marcel Bebey EYID Theodore Mayi Matip, Okala Charles.

Regarding the political agenda, the EU has had several Cameroonian. First, it inherited from that of the UA in 1964, namely, the "African socialism . It was a pale imitation of the "socialist "Leopold Sedar Senghor, Senegal. After 1966, Ahmadou Ahidjo became aware of the incongruous nature of this political agenda, he, a Muslim feudal North, anti-communist to his fingertips, he soon abandoned. He has invented another " development self-centered." After breaking the ears of Cameroonians with this gibberish for a decade, he has added another word gibberish "endogenous . It has become "self-centered development and endogenous . He felt that this was not enough. He added another sentence meaningless gibberish to "self-sustaining." The political program of the UNC has become "self-centered development, endogenous and self-sustaining." What it meant say? He alone knew. The fact is that every speech, Cameroon, during the last years of the reign of Ahmadou Ahidjo had done more than repeat this concept devoid of content.

But beyond all that nonsense, the real agenda of the UNC remained on 3 th point of his mother UC, namely cooperation between France and Cameroon. Translation, everything must go to Paris, the interests of the latter must prevail over all others, including those in Cameroon. When Ahmadou began trying to free themselves from wanting to break this policy, including the awarding of the contract creating the television to the Germans at the expense of France, visits to all-out in other European countries, Belgium Spain, England, etc., we saw what it cost him, he was summoned to Paris, November 4, 1982, he came to announce to Cameroonians dumbfounded, his sacking by France.

THE POLICY AGENDA DPRK

On March 25, 1985, Ahmadou Ahidjo's successor, Paul Biya Bartholomew ' a bi Mvondo, transformed by the name, not by content, Cameroon National Union, UNC, in Cameroon People's Democratic Movement , DPRK. Since there is out verbally with the man who made him king, he also changes, by name, only the political program of the UNC DPRK now. It becomes the "liberal community . An entire book devoted to it. A true masterpiece of literature insipid and boring, the reader of this book should be doctrinaire force, really, to read the hundreds of pages that constitute it. And after this tedious exercise, he knows less about the "liberal Community " that he knew before. Soon, the book that were eager to learn many Cameroonians began to end his days, one hand behind the cabinet where he was exposed, after being tombés, d’autre part, sur les trottoirs des libraires du poteau, pour ne pas dire dans les caniveaux. Pour tout dire, de cette littérature, les Camerounais n’ont rien compris. Non pas qu’ils seraient des cancres, mais, bel et bien, parce que le livre est, tout bonnement, vide. Son auteur, lui-même, à savoir le président de la République, en a fait de même. Il n’en a pas cité bien longtemps le contenu. Il est passé à autre chose, c’est-à-dire, à rien. Actuellement, bien malin qui pourrait dire quelle est le programme politique du Rdpc. Il n’en existe, tout simplement, pas. C’est le président de la République qui, d’une année to another, inventing new themes: "modernity", "great ambitions", etc.. So the reign of piloting prevailing view at this moment, Cameroon. Unfortunately, history provides no example of a country, we want to insist on "no" which came out of the crisis, poverty with a political party in power, no political agenda at the Like the one that governs our country today. Even better, the same history teaches us, rather than what type of party is there to completely destroy a country. This is what happened Haiti, Jean-Claude Duvalier, Zaire, with Joseph-Desire Mobutu in Central Africa with Jean-Bedel Bokassa, Equatorial Guinea with Macias Nguema Biyogo me, etc.. Therefore, think that the CPDM is able to meet in any manner whatsoever Cameroon, to make it a respected country, not least in Africa, not to mention the world, is a huge lure ...